Skyrim is still an incredibly fond memory for me: it was the first Bethesda RPG I dove into, and I loved getting lost in its vast, dense world. The constant tease of a side-story just off the beaten path, and the surprising depth of its lore, made for a thoroughly engrossing adventure that I wish I could experience all over again.

Oblivion Remastered's sudden release was a perfect opportunity to try fulfilling that wish; sadly, for a few reasons, it fell short of my hopeful expectations. It's still been a fascinating experience, though, even if my time in Cyrodiil hasn't measured up against its northern neighbor.

One shortcoming of Oblivion's remaster is - quite understandably - that its core content remains two decades old. The map may be huge, but it isn't as richly detailed as modern genre entries -- that "constant tease of a side-story" I was looking for is, true to this game's 2000s-era origins, more like "constant talking to NPCs for a quest prompt."

A lot of the content here is kinda repetitive, too: from those NPCs' frequently-reused lines of dialog (especially their insipid "rumors" which are frequently some sterile lore factoid) to the titular Oblivion Gate dungeons (full of disappointingly bland paths and dreary copy-and-pasted tunnels).

There are some great storylines to follow in Oblivion, the main story's quests are legitimately gripping, and faction-based quests like the Mages Guild and Dark Brotherhood are well-scripted with some exciting twists. Looking for more narrative in the map's nooks and crannies, however, hasn't tended to accomplish much.

Another let-down in this remaster is overall convenience and usability -- and, yeah, I know it's a Bethesda game. But even after Oblivion Remastered's many, many quality-of-life enhancements, some truly baffling game-script jank and UI flaws mar this experience.

Like the fact that you can sort inventory by item weight, but not quantity weight, so the 2.0-heaviness item that you have 1 of will show as heavier than the 0.5-heaviness item that you have 50 of. It's just math, guys! C'mon.

And there's the map icons for caves, forts, and Oblivion Gates which don't show any indication of completion, even after a gate is closed forever.

And the NPC behaviors and schedules which, despite all the remaster's patches, still do some silly things like the Skooma addicts who...

... Gelephor will never return to the Imperial City. This is because the door can only be opened by those in the Bravil Skooma Den faction, and he is not. Since he cannot use the door, Gelephor will always be found outside the Den...

Again, yeah, it's a Bethesda game. I know and you know and they know that some jankiness is to be expected.

That's part of one other reason why Oblivion Remastered didn't help me experience an Elder Scrolls game "all over again" -- it's already so familiar to me.

After 140 hours in Skyrim, then another 180 hours in Skyrim's Special Edition and DLCs, and then 140 hours in Fallout 4, I've accumulated plenty of experience points in Bethesda's "style." The world-building and quest-scripting techniques that I found so fresh and exciting at first, simply don't hit me as hard anymore.

Which isn't to say I dislike the familiar feeling of unraveling Oblivion's narrative threads. There's still juice worth squeezing here: even after 80 hours of saving the Empire and ascending the ranks of its major factions, I'm still not done.

The Shivering Isles await!

Better than: Fallout 4, The Outer Worlds, probably attempting to replay the original.
Not as good as: Baldur's Gate III, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim - Special Edition, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Becoming more aware of Bethesda's patterns: has dulled my enthusiasm for Starfield, and made me a little more skeptical about The Elder Scrolls VI.

Rarely, very rarely, a game will come out and seem like it's "for me." Not just a new Zelda or another crime sandbox, I mean: occasionally it feels like a game has targeted me, personally. So while I really hadn't intended to splurge on a Switch 2 so soon, this collectathon platformer sandbox with destructible terrain forced my hand.

Donkey Kong Bananza absolutely lives up to the promise implied by a Super Mario Odyssey follow-up. Like Odyssey, every time Bananza reveals a new "sub-level" - a layer of strata on DK's way to the planet core - the environment is always joyously imaginative, visually delightful, and richly stuffed with details to discover.

Bananza very quickly establishes that its downward journey is about much, much more than dirt and magma; layers have their own flora and fauna, lakes and waterfalls, even simulated skies and suns. (The beach resort layer is one of my personal favorites.)

And like Odyssey, Bananza's continuous surprises and delights include a seemingly endless supply of game mechanics: every sub-level introduces new types of terrain which may be uniquely helpful or hazardous, teaching you new traversal techniques; and new enemy types which move and attack in fresh ways, teaching you new tactics.

The titular "bananza" abilities, where DK hulks-out (using bananergy) into a super-buff animal with special powers, are practically underwhelming compared to the crazy variety of game elements happening around DK.

And, of course, the collectible bananas and fossils littering the world can be used to unlock skills - and outfits! - which addictively feed back into that classic collectathon game loop of exploring, collecting, exploring more, collecting more, exploring...

Oh yeah, destructible terrain! Bananza's Red Faction-esque twist, despite being one of my favorite features in any game, is easy to forget because it's so embedded in Bananza's core gameplay.

Digging tunnels through the map isn't (just) a way of exploiting the terrain's intent, nor is it a shallow excuse to hide collectibles underground; DK's punch-based terraforming is an intrinsic part of environmental puzzle solving, those puzzles continuously evolving as new terrain types and terrain-combination reactions come up.

Donkey Kong Bananza is a compelling iteration on the 3D Mario formula, full of creatively awesome levels and mechanics, supporting a wealth of collectible-filled worlds to explore and conquer. AND THEN it slips in a ton of grin-inducing references to Donkey Kong Country history: familiar background theme music, Cranky's tedious rants, side-scrolling challenge levels...

The genuinely shocking reveal of the "real" final boss, and subsequent fake-out ending, and "really finally real" final encounter, had me groaning and smiling the whole time. What an incredible homage to the SNES games' own fake-ending bullshit.

Aside from occasional camera awkwardness when punching through tunnels - and I mean, that's pretty understandable - it's hard to cite any shortfall or disappointment in DK's deepest, punchiest adventure.

Better than: Super Mario Odyssey
Not as good as: The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom, I guess?
All I want now: is more content! ... but, no, not this content.

Progress: 1000 bananas

I knew going into NieR: Automata, last year, that its full story was a multiple-playthroughs affair -- and since I tapped out after one playthrough, I never did get that full story. "Might be better as an anime series," I mused.

And yeah, it is.

Watching through NieR: Automata Ver1.1a doesn't, like, completely make sense; it successfully captures the same feeling of obtuse otherworldliness (a.k.a "unexplained, confusingly weird shit") as the game. But the anime sure is more-sensibly paced, absent the game's chore-like travel requirements.

On top of which, if I understood correctly (though, hey, maybe not) the anime script effectively combines the game's first and second storylines - 2B's and 9S's perspectives - from the start. Way more efficient storytelling.

That said, in the last few episodes it became clear that Automata's "full story" ... was never really here at all.

When the exposition finally does talk about how and why this world is the way that it is, a few suspiciously-specific keywords (particularly Gestalt) are overt enough hints that the foundations of Automata's narrative are in Yoko Taro's other games. So. That's a bit of a let-down.

Regardless: I still got more out of Ver1.1a's linear, non-interactive storytelling than I did from my "meh" experience with the game.

... oh, no. I think I hate this.

Voxelgram remains one of my absolute favorite nonogram games because, on top of spoiling me with puzzle content, it went considerable lengths to make multi-dimensional puzzle solving accessible. By treating each slice of the puzzle as its own grid, even though an individual slice may not be fully solvable, checking another slice for open hints allowed me to make step-by-step progress -- like typical picross logic with an extra dimension.

Voxelgram 2 has chosen to add a two-color mechanic, so grid spaces aren't just "filled," they're marked Blue or Green depending on similarly-colored hints for the row or column. And this affects the fundamental meaning of hints: if three spots are hinted with a Blue 2, that doesn't necessarily mean that one of those 3 spots is empty ... it might be Green.

And therein lies the accessibility conflict that, I hate to say, turned me off of Voxelgram 2. It's no longer possible to make iterative progress on a puzzle by following one row's or column's hints at a time, like a typical nonogram; those hints no longer contain enough information.

Now there are situations where the meaning of a hint is unclear without seeing all of its intersections, which, y'know, might not be visible in the slice you're looking at.

To illustrate, given an orange underline highlights that something can be done in a row or column...

... the middle columns here, with Green "2"s at the top and consecutive green blocks in the middle...

... may look like their topmost and bottommost blocks can be removed. But in fact, only one of those logical deductions is correct...

... because the bottommost blocks are relevant to the depth-wise Blue 5, which in turn is relevant to layers that're hidden in this slice view.

It's not as bad as having to guess, since all the necessary information does exist, but it's frustrating - especially as its predecessor was so user-friendly - that Voxelgram 2's hints require so much additional scanning and inspection to accurately understand.

I'm thrilled that more games like Squeakross: Home Squeak Home are getting made. Not because of its cozy interior-decorating mode - though I'd bet fans of The Sims will enjoy this rat-shaped variant - I mean that I'm stoked on the trend of "nonogram and..." games, games that're loaded with picross puzzles and wrap them with extra features and a substantial theme that forms a unique personality.

Squeakross's personality is pretty adorable.

It's little details like in-game emails from Nini the rodent realtor, and her furniture-building brother Nono - even spam promising free seeds or promoting "logic booster" courses - that show just how much love and care went into crafting this game's squeaky theme.

Of course it's also important for a puzzle game to have a solid user interface; a cute premise can still be made ugly by shoddy messaging or unreliable input-handling. But Squeakross hits it out of the park -- its click-and-drag behavior, its row- and column-based selective zoom, its rich set of hinting options, and they're customizable! Squeakross's UI is really some of the best I've seen.

The only mark against it I'd even consider, is that there are some puzzle grids with dimensions that aren't multiples of 5, and doing coordinate math without those regular guide-lines can be a bit tedious. ... which isn't a big deal at all.

Squeakross is an extremely well-made nonogram game, and the interactive rat dollhouse that's wrapped around it is just delightful. Oh and it has a whopping 650! puzzles, like, damn.

Better than: Logiart Grimoire, Puppy Cross
Not as good as: Piczle Cross Adventure
After all of these cheesy puzzles: I've certainly got my picross fix for- oh, a Voxelgram sequel just came out? ... oh no.

Looking back, it's notable that BioShock's much-lauded narrative mostly occurred off-screen; Rapture's rise and fall, the fracturing of its society and infrastructure, are all over by the time the game starts. (Perhaps to Ken Levine's chagrin, as he's been trying to re-invent interactive storytelling ever since.)

It nailed that retrospective exposition, though - with dramatic audio diaries and poignant environment-art details - and the action-ey, adventure-ey flow of the game was really well-served by having that narrative as its background.

Experiencing those dystopian socioeconomic events in real-time would not be very fun.

I first booted up Deep Rock Galactic way back in May of 2020, for some COVID-lockdown virtual socialization. It didn't stick with me then; I was confused by the different mission structures, and the progression mechanics felt grindy. I moved on.

Years later, my Palworld and Ara: History Untold virtual crew was looking for something new, and ... well, now I'm hooked.

It was DRG's colorful and collectible-filled seasonal events, Yuletide and Lunar Festival and Anniversary and Great Egg Hunt, that actually piqued my interest; I loved that every few weeks we were greeted by new Space Rig decorations, and there were new holiday-themed twists in our missions. (I've been missing those events, I hope there's a summer one coming up.)

And it takes more than a little practice to "get it" -- to understand how each dwarf's mobility tools really work, and how to efficiently tackle each type of objective, and which weapon upgrades are worthwhile.

And then it takes more work to unlock the mechanics that make Deep Rock worth coming back to week after week, month after month: promoting your dwarves and collecting overclocks that can power up your weapons even further.

Is it a grind? Yeah, it sure is.

But once it clicks, once the mechanics finally make sense, the exploring-and-mining gameplay - with friends, with drinks, with the dwarves' lighthearted banter - and the unpredictable emergent moments of randomly-assembled missions, like when your Dreadnought boss fight is interrupted by a swarm of exploding bugs ... it feels worth some grinding.

But a [Fallen Order] sequel could inject some personality into [its characters], and if it focuses up on polishing a smaller feature-set - instead of doing a mediocre job of imitating four different genres - I could absolutely see Respawn delivering a Jedi iteration that's truly exciting from start to finish.

That was my wishful, optimistic hypothesis three years ago. But I guess the simpler and more-likely outcome for Star Wars Jedi: Survivor was always going to be "more of the same" and, yeah, that's what it is.

Just like its predecessor, Survivor crams together Dark Souls map mechanics and stamina-based combat, poorly-interconnected worlds that "can" be revisited but aren't worth the effort, clunkily-controlled Uncharted action sequences, and a story with some well-acted scenes but which lacks an overall compelling (or coherent) plot.

The resulting mess is, well, it's kinda like when a game looks beautiful in a screenshot -- but real-time motion suffers from awful framerates or glitchy visual effects. What I mean is, there are sweet moments in Survivor - wall-running through a canyon, force-pulling a structure down to crush stormtroopers - and when you see intriguing landmarks on the horizon, hear an NPC talk about some side-story, or survey points of interest on the map, it feels like the game is promising a whole lot more exciting content.

But those promises are consistently let down by repetitive and punishing fights; by unclear and inconsistent platforming behavior; by underwhelming puzzle and exploration rewards (yeah, more lightsaber cosmetics!); and by a weirdly-paced story which is only really memorable for how absurd its third-act twist is.

... and by some truly incredible technical issues, even though post-release patches have made some progress, there are still glaring problems. My living room setup's GPU (AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT w/ 8GB VRAM), for example, just wouldn't load most textures (like other reports around the interweb: 1, 2, 3), making many sections of the game literally unplayable due to visual unclarity; I had to stream it from a different PC instead.

(no, this isn't what it's supposed to look like.)

As before, maybe a Souls superfan will get something out of this - particularly the unforgiving combat, which can be downright relentless as the game proceeds, like the Jedha Archive Darth Vader encounter was too tough for me even on "Padawan" difficulty - but otherwise, there's not much here to praise. I'm already struggling to remember those set-piece "sweet moments," days later.

If somehow, despite crippling layoffs, there does end up being a third Cal Kestis game: I don't expect it to be any different.

Progress: finished on Story difficulty.

... what was I doing here again? ... was it building a dark matter factory? No! that's right, I was blogging about video games.

Satisfactory has consumed me over the past couple months, late into the night connecting assembly lines, and early the next morning calculating production requirements for a milestone part. It's got that same "just one more step" addictiveness that Factorio hooked me on -- and while it's easy to summarize Satisfactory as first-person Factorio, there are some differences which help sustain that addiction even longer.

One is its world map, meaning, it has a world map: a deterministic and (at least partially) hand-crafted arrangement of diverse geographic features and landmarks. It's no Hyrule or Toussaint, there's not much "story" to weave into it, but Satisfactory's map is varied and intriguing enough that - while you're searching for more resources or tracking rare collectibles - there's a sense of "new," of freshness that comes from exploring (then exploiting) its nooks and crannies.

The terrain makes great use of verticality, not just for visually-awesome cliffside beaches and towering rock pillars, but as a basis for construction gameplay. Like Factorio, Satisfactory makes you rely heavily on conveyor belts to move materials around; but being able to build them in 3D space, and thread conveyors around hills and through valleys and even caves! adds another fun, well, dimension to the construction game.

(Although I do wish Satisfactory would make it easier to build ultra-long conveyor lines, 'cause having to draw out one segment under the length limit, then another, then another... can be a bit tedious.)

Satisfactory also includes some non-conveyor-belt logistical solutions, but - with the exception of a train line that supplied distant resources to my "main" factory complex - I wasn't very compelled to use them. (I had a cargo truck following a programmed path, for a bit, but that was more trouble than it was worth; and I never even bothered trying the late-game delivery drones.)

One more non-obvious difference between Satisfactory and Factorio is combat: there are hostile alien creeps in this game, including some absolutely hateful and GIANT jumping spiders, but they naturally avoid your buildings. You need weapons to defend yourself while exploring, but your factories don't require any defensive fortification, and you're always safe while hanging out around machinery.

That enables some coziness while you're building out factories and manually assembling parts, which is ... pretty great! It may seem strange that "idling" is a positive feature of the game, since it can detract from "automating" and "optimizing" objectives -- but being able to chill and take it slow is actually kinda nice.

Like I said, first-person Factorio is a straightforward - if reductive - way to sum up Satisfactory; it scratches the same itch, but has more staying power thanks to a well-crafted world and flexible mechanical design. Almost 200 hours later, I sure am satisfied.

Better than: Factorio
Not as good as: I dunno, like, The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom?
Now that I've got my factory-building fix: guess it's back to real-life automation work. sigh

Progress: completed Phase 5, and all production milestones and research trees in version 1.0

Since it languished without an official English translation for almost 14 years, I was immensely surprised that Ace Attorney Investigations 2: Prosecutor's Gambit tells an incredibly good story -- not only an improvement over Edgeworth's earlier, chronologically-chaotic investigation, but one of the best in Ace Attorney's long history.

I was less-pleasantly surprised by just how shitty its (il)logical puzzles are. I've lamented this before - "sometimes-confounding evidence solutions" (Trials and Tribulations), "leap-of-logic evidence puzzles" (Apollo Justice), "expected connections are a leap too far" (Edgeworth's last game) - but I don't think any Ace Attorney game's been quite this bad. Maybe Professor Layton vs. Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney was worse; it's hard to remember.

It's worth spoiling one of the first chapter's deduction puzzles to prove my point. While investigating an attempted assassination:

• One clue is a photograph of the target, flanked by bodyguards, with a bright red dot on his forehead.
• Another clue is a red laser pointer found at the scene.

Can Edgeworth deduce that the red dot was painted by the laser pointer? No; he must first connect that photo to another image, from a newspaper article about the target, to deduce that the red dot is not a birthmark.

...

Investigations 2 is littered with counter-intuitive puzzles like this, deductions that seem unnecessarily obvious or evidence connections that aren't foreshadowed or hinted at all. And then there's Mind Chess, which despite being a thematically-awesome idea...

... uses mechanical rules that are never explained very well (I don't feel like I really "got" it until the game's 4th chapter), and punishes wrong guesses by rewinding - forcing you to re-attempt - multiple dialog-tree choices.

Bring a guide. You'll need some outside help to resolve these investigations.

And they're worth resolving! That's the thing: in spite of its mechanical frustrations, this "Prosecutor's Gambit" absolutely pays off.

In my last post, I called out the previous game's "sincerely confusing" chronology; Investigations 2 tells its story in-order, and also uses flashback scenes in sensible, clever ways -- fleshing out a years-old case with Edgeworth's dad, as it relates to a present-day investigation of similar scenes and characters.

I also griped that protagonist Miles Edgeworth saw "very little character growth" in his first game; Investigations 2 challenges Miles to learn from his reunion with Phoenix, to do more than simply move past his old "perfect prosecutor" ways and really question how he can serve the goal of justice.

(His character development here adds an exciting, satisfying dimension to the more-experienced Edgeworth we see in Dual Destinies and Spirit of Justice.)

I also complained that in the first Investigations, without a regular courtroom or witness stand, supporting characters tended to "feel picked-up and then thrown-away"; Investigations 2 more deliberately and more frequently replicates an Ace Attorney "courtroom feel" when interrogating subjects in the field, developing their stories and stressing-out their personalities over multiple rounds of dialog combat. It even has a traveling judge!

Investigations 2 totally paves over its predecessors' narrative gaps, on top of maintaining this franchise's flair for delightfully absurd characters...

... and for, I can't say this enough, expert localization that positively oozes personality and charm.

This may be my favorite Ace Attorney soundtrack, to boot. Especially when Edgeworth is pushing his cross-examination (and Mind Chess) opponents hardest, this music is some of the pulse-pounding-est that Capcom's ever produced, more thrilling than Apollo Justice or even Mega Man ZX. I've never been so pumped to click dialog choices and watch text appear in a box.

I'm so glad to have finally played Edgeworth's story -- and that's really what Investigations 2 feels like, regardless of recurring guests like Gumshoe and Larry, regardless of references to other games' cases. This is a story about Miles Edgeworth, standing proud and strong on his own.

Better than: Ace Attorney Investigations: Miles Edgeworth, Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Dual Destinies
Not as good as: Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Spirit of Justice (... though it'd be close, if this game's logic puzzles weren't so stupid)
So that's the whole series remastered, then: wonder if we'll survive long enough to see a new Ace Attorney game.